About Book

This article provides a comprehensive review of scholarly literature on preventing violent extremism (PVE), synthesizing evidence from academic studies, policy reports, and practitioner-focused analyses. The authors categorize existing approaches, including community-based interventions, educational programs, deradicalization initiatives, and online monitoring, while critically assessing their effectiveness and underlying assumptions. They highlight recurring challenges, such as inconsistent evaluation methods, overreliance on fear-based narratives, and insufficient integration of local contexts. The relevance to contemporary counterterrorism efforts is substantial: as governments and organizations worldwide continue to develop PVE strategies, this review offers a consolidated knowledge base that identifies best practices and gaps, informing policy, programming, and further research. By framing PVE efforts within a global and multidisciplinary perspective, the article serves as a critical resource for policymakers, practitioners, and researchers seeking evidence-based guidance for designing more effective, culturally sensitive, and sustainable interventions against radicalization and violent extremism.This article is a valuable and foundational contribution to the field of violent extremism prevention. Its broad literature synthesis, critical evaluation of methodologies, and identification of policy gaps make it highly relevant for both academic research and applied counterterrorism programs.The article’s strengths lie in its comprehensive scope, systematic categorization of PVE strategies, and emphasis on critical evaluation of both policy and practice. By integrating findings across multiple disciplines, it offers a holistic perspective often missing in narrower studies. Limitations include reliance on published literature without primary field data, which may omit emergent or context-specific interventions. The review also notes that effectiveness measurements are uneven across studies, a factor that limits the ability to draw definitive conclusions about which interventions work best. Compared to other literature reviews in PVE, this article is particularly strong in linking empirical evidence to policy implications, making it a useful bridge between research and practice. Its unique contribution is the combination of theoretical insights with practical evaluation of interventions, highlighting both successes and structural weaknesses in global PVE programs.