Derogating from International Human Rights Obligations in the ‘War Against Terrorism'? — A British–Australian Perspective
This article examines the United Kingdom’s Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001 and the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Legislation Amendment (Terrorism) Act 2002 (Cth) from an international human rights law perspective. It argues that both pieces of legislation raise serious concerns in relation to inter national legal obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Both international treaties allow for ‘derogation’ from certain provisions in times of ‘public emergency’. While the United Kingdom has officially derogated from some of its treaty obligations, Australia has yet to submit a similar notification. This article argues, however, that the United Kingdom’s derogation is unlawful. Likewise, current circumstances in Australia would not permit lawful derogation from the ICCPR
RELATED Articles
Education system in Pakistan
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Phasellus feugiat nisi non nunc elementum, id tincidunt enim scelerisque. Vestibulum ante ipsum primis in faucibus orci luctus et ultrices posuere cubilia curae; Maecenas fringilla, magna in dapibus scelerisque, purus enim accumsan libero, et ...

