The Geopolitics of Terrorism: A Commentary on Flint and Radil's Approach
An American political geographer and prominent specialist in electoral geography presents a measured and informative critique of the preceding paper by Colin Flint and Steven M. Radil (2009) on “Terrorism and Counter-Terrorism: Situating al-Qaeda and the Global War on Terror within Geopolitical Trends and Structures.” Among the issues explored are the extent to which the observed patterns of terrorism might differ depending on whether “international” or “domestic” incidents are the focus of attention, and whether fatalities associated with inci dents might prove a better metric of terrorism’s psychological impact than per capita incident frequency alone. A deeper issue debated in the critique involves the thorny question of whether a singular focus on relative economic deprivation (and on its variations between countries rather than also within countries) offers an adequate explanation for the incidence of terrorism given the complexity of cultural (including ethnicity and religion), social, economic, and politi cal factors that motivate terrorist acts in diverse settings across the world. Journal of Economic Literature, Classification Numbers: I390, O100, Y900. 32 references. Key words: terrorism, GWOT, relative deprivation, nationalism, religious fundamentalism, organized cr
RELATED Articles
Education system in Pakistan
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Phasellus feugiat nisi non nunc elementum, id tincidunt enim scelerisque. Vestibulum ante ipsum primis in faucibus orci luctus et ultrices posuere cubilia curae; Maecenas fringilla, magna in dapibus scelerisque, purus enim accumsan libero, et ...

